The great part is that my "movement" is driven by the same goals as the Catholic church I work for and go to school at for my graduate work. This movement is very simple. We are to help the poor and the marginalized. In our case it is within the realm of education.
I initially thought my movement, both in reading the first half of the chapter and in my Masters studies, was more aligned with the "inquiry-based-student/subject-centered-collaborative-constructivist" movement trying so desperately to break through to high schools and undergraduate "weeder" college courses. I suppose it still is when looking at the pedagogical methods that best serve the poor and the marginalized but my focus is more clear regardless.
The final page of our chapter sums up my feelings quite nicely:
"As we find our place in the movement, we will discover that there is no essential conflict between loving to teach and working to reform education. An authentic movement is not a play for power. It is teaching and learning writ large. Now the world becomes our classroom, and the potential to teach and learn is found everywhere. We need only be in the world as our true selves, with open hearts and minds" (Palmer, 2007, p. 190).
Donny G, the truth is in your heart! It has been a pleasure to blog and comment with you...and more so to walk with you every Thursday evening from 5:30 to 8.
ReplyDeleteEducational movement after movement, fad after fad, has come and gone in American history. Let's hope the message of Palmer is different and courage to see the world differently -- not just the latest 'thing' - will actually have a lasting impact -- just as the message of the Church is a wish and a prayer.
ReplyDeleteYes, Don. You are onto something big. I look forward to working with you in the ICEL program as we grow as educators.
ReplyDelete